High CourtsSingle Bench

Umesh Chandra Kavidayal & Others vs Mahendra Singh Yadav & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 11 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0160

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2467 Of 2011
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 154 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

This is plaintiffs’ writ petition against the order dated 24.05.2011 passed by learned trial court in Civil Suit No. 2 of 2011. By the said order,

their temporary injunction application was rejected. The said order was subsequently affirmed in appeal filed by them under Order 43(1)(r) of CPC.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel for the parties have informed the Court that the parties have entered into compromise and the Original Suit No. 2 of 2011 has also

been decided in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. They further submit that now the writ petition has become infructuous.

4.

Since this writ petition was filed against an interlocutory order, therefore, after decision in the pending suit, the cause of action does not survive.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.