High CourtsSingle Bench

Lata Singh vs Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 20 September 2021 · Citation: (2021) 09 UK CK 0187

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Section 96 · Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 41 Rule 27
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2284 Of 2014
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 138 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

This writ petition is directed against the order dated 06.09.2014 passed by learned 5th Additional District Judge, Dehradun in Civil Appeal No.50 of 2009 filed by the petitioner under Section 96 of CPC read with Order 41 of C.P.C. By the said order, petitioner's application under Order 41 Rule 27 has been rejected.

2.

Mr. Neeraj Garg, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the first appeal itself was decided by learned Additional District Judge, Dehradun, against which, second appeal was filed, which too has been dismissed by coordinate Bench of this Court.

3.

Since this writ petition was filed against an interlocutory order, therefore, after decision in the first appeal, the cause of action does not survive.

4.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.