High CourtsSingle Bench

VENUDHAR BARETH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 28 March 2018 · Citation: (2018) 03 CHH CK 0327

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. SAM KOSHY
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 304B, 498A · Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Section 3, 4
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE NO. 749 OF 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 433 words
1.

This is the first bail application seeking for grant of bail to the Applicant who is in jail since 27.06.2017 in connection with Crime No. 61 of 2017

registered at Police Station Sariya, Distt. Raigarh, for the offence punishable under Sections 304-B/34, 498-A IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry

Prohibition Act.

2.

As per prosecution case, the applicant and other co-accused persons is said to have subjected the deceased ill treatment, torture and harassment on

account of demand of dowry and when she could not resist torture, she finally committed suicide by setting herself ablaze on 01.05.2017.

3.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that it is a case where the marriage took place four years back and that dying declaration also was

recorded wherein she has not made any allegations against the members at the matrimonial home. Rather she has stated that she has voluntarily

committing suicide on account of assault made by the present applicant about 3 days earlier. It was further contended that other co-accused persons

in the instant case i.e. sister in law and father in law of the deceased have already been granted bail by this court in M.Cr.C. No.6314 of 2017 on

28.11.2017. Further, the nature of allegations made against the applicant is similar to that of allegations made against the co-accused persons who

have already been released on bail and therefore prayed that the present applicant may also be granted bail on the ground of parity.

4.

However, the state counsel opposes the bail application and submits that there are serious allegations against the applicant by the father and mother

of the deceased. Further, in the past also due harassment made on account of demand of dowry, the deceased had left the matrimonial home and had

been staying with her parents for about one year, and therefore, the applicant may not be released on bail.

5.

Without commenting on merits, considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case particularly taking note of the fact that other co-

accused persons have already been granted bail and also considering the period of custody undergone by the applicant, this Court is of the opinion that

the present is a fit case where the Applicant can be enlarged on bail.

6.

Accordingly, the application for grant of bail is allowed. It is directed that the Applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond

for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court for his appearance as and when directed.