High CourtsSingle Bench

Vijay vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 2 March 2020 · Citation: (2020) 03 MP CK 0002

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. K. Awasthi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437(3), 439 · Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 — Section 34(2), 59(A)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 8635 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 403 words

This first application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 has been filed by applicant, who is implicated in connection with Crime

No.502/2019 registered at Police Station Bag, District Dhar (MP) for offence punishable under Section 34 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Excise Act,

1915.

The applicant is in custody since 15.12.2019.

As per prosecution story, on the basis of source information, 63 bulk liters of country made liquor worth Rs.17,500/- has been recovered from

possession of the present applicant, for which he was not having any valid license. Hence, the present case has been registered against the applicant.

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is young boy aged about 21 years and he is not having any criminal antecedents. 63

bulk litre of liquor alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant. The applicant is in custody since 15.12.2019. There is no

possibility of his absconsion or tempering the evidence, if enlarged on bail. The offence registered against the applicant is triable by Judicial Magistrate

First Class. Learned counsel for the applicant assured that in future applicant will not be faulted with the provision of Section 59 (A) of the M.P.

Excise Act, 1915. Conclusion of the trial will take sufficiently long time. Under these circumstances, learned counsel for the applicant prays for grant

of bail to the applicant.

Learned Public Prosecutor for the non-applicant / State of Madhya Pradesh submits that no sufficient ground is made out for releasing the applicant

on bail, hence the application filed by the applicant be dismissed.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, but without commenting on the

merits of the case, the application filed by the applicant is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond in

the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his regular

appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he / she shall remain present before the court concerned during trial and shall also

abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

This order shall be effective till the end of the trial, however, in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.

Certified copy as per rules.