High CourtsDivision Bench(2021) 01 DEL CK 0111

Vikas Yadav And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 11 January 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manmohan, J · Asha Menon, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 319 Of 2021, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 805 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 400 words

Manmohan, J

1.

The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2.

Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents to detail and fix the duties of the Petitioners with Unit Medical Inspection

Room and Hospitals in order to properly utilize the special knowledge possessed by the Petitioners and to grant the benefit of Hospital Patient Care

Allowance and Patient Care Allowance (HPCA/PCA) as has been accorded to other Central Government Organizations in terms of letter dated 04th

February 2004.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that in light of acute shortage of trained Lab Tech Staff for operating semi auto analyzer equipments

installed at various units of the Force, order dated 13th February 2020 was issued, whereby the said personnel were directed to be deployed according

to their special qualification i.e. as trained Lab Technicians. However, it is the case of the Petitioners that they are being detailed with Sentry Night

Duties or with the duties of Morcha.

4.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that the Petitioners should also be granted HPCA/PCA allowance as directed by Ministry of Home

Affairs vide order dated 17th January 2020 with respect to personnel under MHA.

5.

Issue notice.

6.

Mr.Ruchir Mishra, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

7.

Learned counsel for the Respondents states that the Petitioners are not entitled to HPCA/PCA as the petitioners have admittedly not performed the

relevant duties and in any event, the said allowance has been subsumed under the Risk and Hazardous Allowance under the 7th Pay Commission.

8.

In rejoinder, learned counsel for the Petitioners disputes the aforesaid contentions.

9.

Keeping in view the fact that the Respondents have not passed any speaking order and/or dealt with the contentions of the Petitioners, this Court

directs the present writ petition to be treated as a written representation to the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Union of India who is directed to

decide the same by way of a reasoned order within twelve weeks in accordance with law, after taking inputs from the respondent no.2. It is clarified

that the rights and contentions of all the parties are left open. This Court clarifies that it has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the

controversy.

10.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.