AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
15 paragraphs · 236 wordsThe instant application has been filed by the petitioner seeking extension of time for filing the affidavit, stamp and court fee etc in support of the
petition.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The petitioner shall do the needful within a period of three days, when the normal
functioning of the Courts begins.
Application is, accordingly, disposed of.
The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to decide the representation/appeal filed by the petitioner
against the order of termination dated 16.01.2019. A perusal of the memorandum dated 10.12.2019 reveals that the representation filed by the
petitioner has been forwarded to the concerned authority.
Mr. Z. A. Mughal, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied in case this petition is disposed of with a direction
to the respondents to decide the representation/appeal filed by the petitioner within a fixed time frame.
Mr. Vishal Sharma, learned ASGI appearing for the respondents is also not averse to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Having regard to the grievance of the petitioner and the relief sought, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the
representation/appeal of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date copy of this order is made available to the respondents by the
petitioner.
Disposed of.
