High CourtsSingle Bench

Vinod vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 November 2024 · Citation: (2024) 11 UK CK 0026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 8, 20, 21
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 2201 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 191 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant is in judicial custody in Case Crime No.328 of 2024, under Section 8/20/21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (“the Act”), Police Station- Nehru Colony, District- Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

According to the FIR, on 15.10.2024, 7 Kgs Ganja and 22 grams Heroine were allegedly recovered from the possession of the applicant.

4.

It is the case of the applicant that the allegedly recovered quantity is less than commercial; there has been non-compliance of the provisions of the Act; he is not a previous convict.

5.

Learned State Counsel admits that the bail rejection order does not reveal any previous conviction of the applicant.

6.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

7.

The bail application is allowed.

8.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.