Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Vodafone Idea Limited vs Krishan Lal Nain & Anr

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 18 February 2022 · Citation: (2022) 02 TDSAT CK 0072

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shiva Kirti Singh, Chairperson · Subodh Kumar Gupta, Member
CASE NUMBER
Cyber Appeal 8 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 268 words

Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Advocate has appeared today on behalf of respondent no. 2 â€" IDBI Bank Ltd. He submits that he has sent his Vakalatnama

to the Registry of the Tribunal by Post two days back. The office shall trace the same and show the name of Mr. Tiwari as counsel for respondent

no. 2.

Today M.A. No. 412/2012 and M.A. No. 413/2012 filed on behalf of appellant are scheduled for hearing. Pleadings in respect of those M.As. is

said to be complete.

The prayer in M.A. No. 412/2021 is to direct respondent no. 1/complainant to place on record his concerned Bank statement for the period 25.5.2017

to 31.5.2017. This prayer has already been conceded on behalf of respondent no. 1. Learned counsel for respondent no. 1 Mr. Vakul Sharma prays

for, and is granted, three weeks’ time to furnish the required details on an affidavit. M.A. No. 412/2021 is disposed of accordingly.

The prayer made in M.A. No. 413/2021 is to permit the appellant to place on record the CDRs of respondent no. 1/complainant’s mobile number

9413377307 for the period 25.5.2017 to 31.5.2017. This prayer has been contested by respondent no. 1 by filing reply.

Learned counsel for respondent no. 2, if so advised, may file a reply to the aforesaid M.A. No. 413/2021 within two weeks. If required, rejoinder

may be filed to the said reply within one week thereafter. Â

Post the matter under the same head on 23.3.2022 for considering M.A. No. 413 of 2021.

It will be open for respondent no. 2 to file reply to the memo of appeal within five weeks.