High CourtsSingle Bench

Yashpal Rana vs Ramesh Kumar Sudhanshu

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 20 September 2021 · Citation: (2021) 09 UK CK 0169

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 252 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 129 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

WPMS No. 1502 of 014 filed by Nagar Nigam, Roorkee, through petitioner, was disposed of with a direction to Principal Secretary, Urban Development, Uttarakhand to take appropriate action based on the report dated 03.03.2015, within three months.

2.

Learned Standing Counsel has produced in Court today, an order dated 01.06.2018 passed by Secretary, Urban Development, Uttarakhand, which is taken on record. Perusal of the said order indicates that Secretary concerned has cancelled the allotment of shops based on resolution of the Nagar Nigam.

3.

Since the Secretary, Urban Development has passed an appropriate order in terms of order passed by Writ Court, therefore, nothing survives in this contempt petition.

4.

Accordingly, contempt petition is closed. Contempt notices issued to the respondent is hereby discharged.