AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
36 paragraphs · 343 wordsHeard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public
Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the complainant. Perused
the material available on the record.
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in connection
with FIR No.56/2017 registered at Dungarpur Kotwali Police
Station, Distt. Dungarpur for the offences under Sections 448,
323, 307 and 109 / 34 IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner makes an offer that the
petitioner is ready to pay interim compensation to the tune of
Rs.50,000/- by way of solace to the injured Sanjay, to whom the
life endangering injury was caused. He points out that co-accused
Sunil and Shanker have been granted bail on the same
consideration and prays that the petitioner too deserves to be
released on bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the
complainant have opposed the prayer for bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and
the fact that the petitioner is ready to make payment of interim
compensation to the tune of Rs.50,000/- to the injured Sanjay,
this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner deserves to be
released on bail in this case.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that
the accused-petitioner Aarif arrested in connection with FIR
No.56/2017 registered at Dungarpur Kotwali Police Station, Distt.
Dungarpur shall be released on bail on his depositing a sum of
Rs.50,000/- with the learned trial Court by way of interim
compensation to the injured Sanjay and provided he furnishes a
personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/-
each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the
stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and
as and when called upon to do so.
The amount so deposited by the accused shall be disbursed
to the injured Sanjay. It is made clear that the compensation
offered by the accused shall not be treated to be an admission of
offence.
