AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
34 paragraphs · 334 wordsHeard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public
Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the complainant. Perused
the material available on the record.
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners, who are in custody in
connection with FIR No.15/2017 registered at Police Station Guda
Endla, Distt. Pali for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 325
and 307 / 34 IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioners makes an offer that the
petitioners are ready to pay interim compensation to the tune of
Rs.1,00,000/- by way of solace to the injured Mehra Ram, who
received grievous injuries in the incident. He thus prays that the
petitioners deserve to be released on bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the
complainant have opposed the prayer for bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and
the fact that the petitioners have offered interim compensation to
the tune of Rs.1,00,000/- to the injured Mehra Ram, this Court is
of the opinion that they deserve to be released on bail in this case.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that
the accused-petitioners namely, (1) Pappu Ram and (2) Banshi Lal
arrested in connection with FIR No.15/2017 registered at Police
Station Guda Endla, Distt. Pali shall be released on bail on their
depositing a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with the learned trial Court by
way of interim compensation to the injured Mehra Ram and
provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/-
and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of
the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that
Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do
so.
The amount so deposited by the accused shall be disbursed
to the injured Mehra Ram. It is made clear that the compensation
offered by the accused shall not be treated to be an admission of
offence.
