AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
33 paragraphs · 347 wordsHeard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in relation to
F.I.R. No.5/2017, Police Station Sarwana for the offences under
Sections 341, 323 and 326 IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the
petitioner disputes the prosecution case but for the present, he is
ready to offer interim compensation to the tune of Rs.50,000/- to
the injured Sukh Ram without prejudice to his defence at the trial.
He urges that the petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of
the case is likely to take a long time. He thus prays that the
petitioner deserves to be released on bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the
submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Having regard to the overall facts and circumstances of the
case and looking to the fair offer of compensation made by the
learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner and keeping in view the
nature and location of injuries inflicted to the injured, this Court is
of the opinion that the petitioner deserves to be released on bail.
Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered
that the accused-petitioner namely Bhagwana Ram arrested in
connection with F.I.R. No.5/2017, Police Station Sarwana shall be
released on bail; provided he deposits a sum of Rs.50,000/- in the
trial Court to be paid to the injured Sukh Ram by way of interim
compensation and upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/-
and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of
the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that
Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do
so. The amount of compensation upon being deposited by the
petitioner, shall be disbursed to the injured Sukh Ram. However,
the offer of compensation shall not be treated to be prejudicial to
the defences of the petitioner at the trial.
