High CourtsSingle Bench

Ajit Kumar vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 10 February 2003 · Citation: (2003) 02 P&H CK 0238

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amar Dutt, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 120B, 419, 420, 467, 468
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 33543-M of 2002
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 126 words

Amar Dutt, J.—Mr. Mansoor Ali, on the instructions from SI Baldev Singh, states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and he is longer required by the investigation agency.

2.

In view of this, the order dated 13.8.2002 is made absolute. It is, however, made clear that the benefit of this order will enure to the petitioner till the filing of the challan whereupon he would furnish fresh bail bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

3.

In case, the petitioner, at any stage, absents himself from the Court proceedings without the prior permission of the Court of threaten or try to pressurise the witnesses, it shall be open to the trial Court to cancel his bail and secure his presence through non bailable warrants.