High CourtsSingle Bench

Parabhjit Singh and Paramjit Singh vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 30 January 2003 · Citation: (2003) 01 P&H CK 0277

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amar Dutt, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 148, 149, 324, 326, 341
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 22164-M of 2002
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 120 words

Amar Dutt, J.—Mr. Mansoor Ali states that the petitioners have joined the investigation and they are no longer required by the investigating agency.

2.

In view of this, the order dated 29.5.2002 is made absolute. It is, however, made clear that the benefit of the order will (SIC) to the petitioners till the filing of the challan whereupon they would furnish fresh bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

3.

In case, the petitioners at any stage, absent themselves from the Court proceedings without the prior permission of the Court or threaten or try to pressurise the witnesses, it shall be open to the trial Court to cancel their bail and secure their presence through non bailable warrants.