High CourtsSingle Bench

Prabhdeep Singh vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 4 February 2003 · Citation: (2003) 02 P&H CK 0061

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amar Dutt, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 323, 34, 341, 354, 364
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 31031-M of 2002
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 117 words

Amar Dutt, J.—State Counsel, on instruction from Head Constable Rohi Ram, states that the petitioner is no longer required for further investigation.

2.

In view of this, the order dated 30.7.2002 is made absolute. It is, however, made clear that the benefit of this order will enure to the petitioner till the filing of challan, whereupon he would furnish fresh bail bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

3.

In case the petitioner at any stage, absents himself from the Court proceedings without the prior permission of the Court or threatens or tries to pressurise the witnesses, it shall be open to the trial court to cancel his bail and secure his presence through non-bailable warrants.