High CourtsSingle Bench

Amit Ahmad vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 10 August 2018 · Citation: (2018) 08 UK CK 0065

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 379
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 1416 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 183 words

SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J. (ORAL)

Heard Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for the applicant and Mr. J.S. Virk, AGA, for the State of Uttarakhand.

The applicant is in jail having been implicated in FIR No.477 of 2017, which has been registered under Section 379 of IPC, at Police Station â€

Bajpur, District-Udham Singh Nagar.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused, namely, Farukh has already been granted bail by this Court in BA 1st No. 265 of 2018

vide order dated 09.03.2018.

Considering the overall evidence, which is presently available before this Court, prima facie, the applicant has been able to make out a case for bail at

least on parity. The bail application is allowed accordingly.

Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the equal amount to the

satisfaction of the Magistrate/court concerned.

It is made clear that any observations made by this Court are only for the purposes of grant of bail. It shall not be taken into consideration at all in any

other proceedings.