High CourtsSingle Bench

Amit Ahmad vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 10 August 2018 · Citation: (2018) 08 UK CK 0066

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 379, 411
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No.1419 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 210 words

SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J. (ORAL)

Heard Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate for the applicant and Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.K. Joshi, Brief Holder for the

State.

The applicant is in jail having been implicated in FIR No. 475 of 2017, which has been registered under Sections 379 and 411 of IPC, at Police Station

Bajpur, District Udham Singh Nagar.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in jail since 23.10.2017 and co-accused person has already been granted bail by this

Court in BA1 No.404 of 2018 vide order dated 07.03.2018.

Considering the overall evidence which is presently available before this Court and the fact that co-accused has already been granted bail by this

Court, prima facie, the applicant has been able to make out a case for bail at least on parity. The bail application is allowed accordingly.

Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the equal amount to the

satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned/court concerned.

It is made clear that any observations made by this Court are only for the purposes of grant of bail. It shall not be taken into consideration at all in any

other proceedings.