Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Central Bank Of India vs Ms Raatronics And Others

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 19 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 TDSAT CK 0041

HON’BLE JUDGES
Brijesh Kumar, Registrar
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Cyber Appeal 6 Of 2015

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 133 words

Ms. Shagun Bhargava appears for R-4, the erstwhile State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur (SBBJ), and submits that SBBJ has merged with State Bank of

India. She further submits that she may be served with a copy of Memo of Appeal through e-mail.  Ms. Anita Saran, appearing for appellant

undertakes to supply a copy of the Memo of Appeal.  It was prayed on behalf of R-4 that four weeks time be granted for filing reply.  Prayer

is allowed. R-4 to file its reply within four weeks.  Appellant may file its rejoinder, if any, in two weeks thereafter.  Appellant may take

necessary steps to get the name of R-4 changed and accordingly file the amended Memo of Parties. List the matter on 3rd May, 2021 for

directions.  Â