High CourtsSingle Bench

Dadi Ram Sharma vs State Of Sikkim And Others

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 15 February 2023 · Citation: (2023) 02 SIK CK 0006

HON’BLE JUDGES
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 11 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 91 words

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J

The matter has been returned from Meditation unsettled.

It is submitted by Learned Government Advocate for the State-Respondents that the matter could not be settled on account of paucity of time and due to transfer of Officers in the concerned Government Departments. That, his instructions are that the State-Respondents are willing to pay the land acquisition amount however the amount is yet to be computed for which some time is required.

Let the State-Respondents take steps within four weeks’ from today.

List the matter accordingly on 17-03-2023.