High CourtsSingle Bench

Deewan Alias Banti vs State Of M.P

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 5 October 2020 · Citation: (2020) 10 MP CK 0077

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anand Pathak, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 342, 376 · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 3, 4, 5G, 6, 17 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 38222 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

27 paragraphs · 1,208 words

Anand Pathak, J

The applicant has filed this first bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail. Applicant has been arrested on 26-07-2020 by Police Station Saray Chhola, District Morena in connection with Crime No.20/2020 registered for offence punishable under Sections 376, 342, 34 of IPC and Sections 3,4,5G,6 and 17 of POCSO Act.

It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that false case has been registered against him and he is suffering confinement since 26-07-2020 and charge-sheet is likely to be filed soon. It is further submitted that prosecutrix is relative of the applicant, she is wife of brother-in-law of the applicant. Prosecutrix suffered her husband recently and therefore, in order to get her legitimate share in the property of her husband this false allegation has been levelled. Looking to the prevailing condition of COVID-19, he seeks bail on sympathetic grounds also. He further undertakes not to be source of embarrassment and harassment to the complainant party in any manner and till the dispute is resolved, he shall not move in the close proximity of the prosecutrix and would cooperate in investigation/trial. He further undertakes to abide by all the terms and conditions of guidelines, circulars and directions issued by Central Government, State Government as well as Local Administration regarding measures in respect of COVID-19 Pandemic and maintain hygiene in the vicinity while keeping physical distancing. Applicant further undertakes to perform community service to purge his misdeed, if any and to serve National /Environmental/Social cause on his own volition.

Counsel for the State opposed the prayer and prayed for dismissal of the bail application.

Heard learned counsel for the parties at length through VC and considered the arguments advanced by them.

After considering the rival submissions as well as considering the peculiar fact situation, wherein, we are facing wrath of pandemic COVID-19, this Court is of the considered opinion that applicant deserves to be released on bail.

Considering the fact situation of the case and the challenging time of COVID-19 pandemic, but without commenting on the merits of the case, it is hereby directed that the applicant shall be released on bail, on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) alongwith one solvent surety of like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court and that he will have to install Arogya Setu App, if not already installed.

In view of COVID-19 pandemic, the jail authorities are directed that before releasing the applicant, his preliminary Corona Virus test shall be conducted and if he is found negative, then he be released and if he is found positive then the applicant shall be immediately sent to concerned hospital for his treatment as per medical norms. After release, the applicant shall strictly follow all the instructions which may be issued by the Central Govt./State Govt. or Local Administration for combating the Covid19. If it is found that the applicant has violated any of the instructions of the Central Govt./State Govt. or Local Administration, then this order shall automatically lose its effect, and Police Authorities shall immediately take him in custody and would sent him to the same jail from where he was released.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicants :-

1.The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

2.

The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3.

The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4.

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;

5.

The applicant will not be a source of embarrassment or harassment to the complainant party in any manner and applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial;

6.

The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be;

7.

Applicant shall not be source of harassment and embarrassment to the prosecutrix in any manner and he shall not move in the close proximity of prosecutrix.

8.

The applicant will inform the SHO of concerned police station about his residential address in the said area and it would be the duty of the Public Prosecutor to send E-copy of this order

9.

एतद् द्वारा यह निर्देशित किया जाता है कि आवेदक 02 पौधों का (यथासंभव कोई भी फल देने वाले पेड़ अथवा नीम/पीपल जैसे पेड़) रोपण करेगा तथा उसे अपने आस पड़ोस में पेड़ों की सुरक्षा की व्यवस्था करनी होगी ताकि पौधे सुरक्षित रह सके। आवेदक का यह कर्तव्य है कि न केवल पौधों को लगाया जाऐ, बल्कि उन्हें पोषण भी दिया जाए। ''वृक्षारोपण के साथ, वृक्षापोषण भी आवश्यक है।'' आवेदक संभवतः 6-8 फीट ऊॅंचे पौधे/पेड़ों को 3-4 फीट गड्ढा करके लगायेगा ताकि वे शीघ्र ही पूर्ण विकसित हो सकें। अनुपालन सुनिश्चित करने के लिए, आवेदक को रिहा किये जाने की दिनांक से 30 दिनों के भीतर संबंधित विचारण न्यायालय के समक्ष वृक्षों/पौधों के रोपण के सभी फोटो प्रस्तुत करना होगें। तत्पश्चात्, विचारण के समापन तक हर तीन महीने में आवेदक के द्वारा विचारण न्यायालय के समक्ष प्रगति रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत की जाएगी ।

वृक्षों की प्रगति पर निगरानी रखना विचारण न्यायालय का कर्तव्य है क्योंकि पर्यावरण क्षरण के कारण मानव अस्तित्व दांव पर है और न्यायालय अनुपालन के बारे में आवेदक द्वारा दिखाई गई किसी भी लापरवाही को नजर अंदाज नही कर सकता है। इसलिए आवेदक को पेड़ों की प्रगति और आवेदक द्वारा अनुपालन के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत करने के लिए निर्देशित किया जाता है एवं आवदेक द्वारा किये गये अनुपालन की एक संक्षप्ति रिपेार्ट इस न्यायालय के समक्ष प्रत्येक तीन माह में (अगले छः महीनों के लिए) रखी जायेगी जिसे कि ''निर्देश'' शीर्ष के अंतर्गत रखा जाएगा।

वृक्षारोपण में या पेड़ों की देखभाल में आवेदक की ओर से की गई कोई भी चूक आवेदक को जमानत का लाभ लेने से वंचित कर सकती है।

आवेदक को अपनी पसंद के स्थान पर इन पौधों/पेडों को रोपने की स्वतंत्रता होगी, यदि वह इन रोपे गये पेडों की ट्री गार्ड या बाड़ लगाकर रक्षा करना चाहता है, तो वह अपने स्वंय के व्यय पर यह करने के लिये स्वतंत्र होगा।

इस न्यायालय द्वारा यह निर्देश एक परीक्षण प्रकरण के तौर पर दिए गए हैं ताकि हिंसा और बुराई के विचार का प्रतिकार, सृजन एवं प्रकृति के साथ एकाकार होने के माध्यम से सामंाजस्य स्थापित किया जा सके। वर्तमान में मानव अस्तित्व के आवश्यक अंग के रूप में दया, सेवा, प्रेम एवं करूंणा की प्रकृति को विकसित करने की आवश्यकता है क्योंकि यह मानव जीवन की मूलभूत प्रवृतियां हैं और मानव अस्तित्व को बनाए रखने के लिए इनका पुनर्जीवित होना आवश्यक है।

''यह प्रयास केवल एक वृक्ष के रोपण का प्रश्न न होकर बल्कि एक विचार के अंकुरण का है।''

यह निर्देश आवेदक के द्वारा स्वतः व्यक्त की गई सामुदायिक सेवा की इच्छा के कारण दिया गया है जो स्वैच्छिक है।

E- copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance, if possible, for the office of this Court.

Certified copy/ e-copy as per rules/directions.

Application stands allowed and disposed of.