High CourtsSingle Bench

Govind Ballabh vs Dhiraj Singh Garbiyal & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 16 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0242

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 198 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 149 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

WPMS No. 1160 of 2020 filed by the petitioner was disposed of with certain directions to the District Magistrate, Naintial.

2.

In this contempt petition, it is alleged that the order passed by Writ Court has not been complied with.

3.

A compliance affidavit has been filed by District Magistrate, Nainital. Perusal of annexure 2 of the said affidavit indicates that District Magistrate

considered the case of the petitioner in terms of the order passed by Writ Court and issued necessary directions to the concerned authorities, including

Regional Transport Officer and Regional Manager, Uttarakhand Forest Corporation.

4.

Since the direction issued by Writ Court has been complied with by the District Magistrate, Nainital, therefore, contempt petition is closed. Notices

issued to the opposite parties are hereby discharged. However, petitioner shall be at liberty to approach appropriate forum for redressal of his

grievance, if any.