High CourtsSingle Bench

Vinay Kumar Tyagi vs Anand Bardhan & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 26 October 2021 · Citation: (2021) 10 UK CK 0156

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 382, 383 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 90 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Mr. J.S. Bisht, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite parties, based on instructions, submits, that not only petitioner's representation(s) has been decided in terms of the order(s) passed by Writ Court, but their retiral dues have also been released.

2.

Mr. Mahavir Kohli, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Neetu Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners does not dispute the statement so made on behalf of the opposite parties.

3.

Accordingly, the contempt petitions are closed. Notices issued to the opposite parties are hereby discharged.