High CourtsSingle Bench

Inderjeet vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 UK CK 0093

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 295 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 201 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioner took a loan (Cash Credit Limit) of Rs. 35,00,000/- from Punjab National Bank, Branch Laksar, District Haridwar. Since petitioner

defaulted in repayment of the amount of loan, therefore, proceedings for recovery have been initiated against him. Thus, feeling aggrieved, petitioner

has approached this Court.

2.

After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready and willing to repay the entire loan amount, but some

reasonable time may be given to him for the purpose.

3.

Mr. Siddhartha Jain, learned counsel for the respondent-bank submits that if petitioner approaches bank authorities by filing a representation, the

same shall be considered, in accordance with law.

3.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the bank

authorities by making representation within ten days from today. Along with representation, petitioner shall also deposit a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with

the bank in order to show his bona fide. If petitioner makes such representation and also deposits Rs. 1,00,000/- within stipulated time, then the bank

authorities shall consider petitioner’s request, in accordance with law, within two weeks thereafter.