High CourtsSingle Bench

Jiwan Kumar Bhusal vs State Of Sikkim & Ors.

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 4 August 2023 · Citation: (2023) 08 SIK CK 0022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 21 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 106 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The State of Sikkim is represented by Mr. Shakil Raj Karki, learned Assistant Government Advocate for respondent no.1; Dr. Doma T. Bhutia, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S.K. Chettri, learned Advocate seeks to represent respondent no.2. Ms. Mon Maya Subba, learned counsel appears for respondent no.3.

2.

Mr. S.K. Chettri, learned Advocate submits that he would be filing his Vakalatnama during the course of the day. Permitted. All the respondents are represented. Four weeks time is granted to the respondents to file their counter-affidavits and two weeks thereafter, to the petitioner to file rejoinder, if any.

3.

List on 27.09.2023.