High CourtsSingle Bench

Malvika Foundation & Anr. vs State Of Sikkim & Anr.

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 1 March 2023 · Citation: (2023) 03 SIK CK 0005

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 31 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 92 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

The respondent no.3 appears through Mr. S.K. Sharma, learned counsel. He desires to file his Vakalatnama during the course of the day. He also seeks four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Granted. Two weeks thereafter, to the petitioners to file rejoinder, if any. Dr. Doma T. Bhutia, learned Additional Advocate General submits that she had filed an amended counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 and 2. Two weeks is granted to the petitioners to file rejoinder, if they, so desire.

List thereafter, on 03.05.2023.