High CourtsSingle Bench

M/S Nauratanmal Ashok Kumar vs Yangzila Bhutiani

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 30 July 2024 · Citation: (2024) 07 SIK CK 0027

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Regular First Appeal No. 12 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 85 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The appellant is unrepresented. The records revealed that the appellant appears in person in the present appeal. Today he is not present in Court. There is no application filed by the appellant as well. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent however, submits that the appellant’s son had messaged him saying that the appellant is unwell and would be seeking adjournment through a representator. However, none appears.

2.

In view of the same, list this matter again on 12.11.2024.