High CourtsSingle Bench

M/S Nauratanmal Ashok Kumar & Anr vs Yangzila Bhutiani & Anr.

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 30 July 2024 · Citation: (2024) 07 SIK CK 0026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Regular First Appeal No. 06 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 89 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The appellants are unrepresented. The records revealed that the appellant no.2 appears in person in the present appeal. Today he is not present in Court. There is no application filed by the appellants as well. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 however, submits that the appellant no.2’s son had messaged him saying that the appellant no.2 is unwell and would be seeking adjournment through a representator. However, none appears.

2.

In view of the same, list this matter again on 12.11.2024.