High CourtsDivision Bench

Neenu Devi vs State of H.P. and Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 21 May 2010 · Citation: (2010) 05 SHI CK 0019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, C.J · Dev Darshan Sood, J
CASE NUMBER
C. Review No. 45 of 2010

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 100 words

Kurian Joseph, C.J.

CMP(M) No. 397 of 2010.

1.

Delay in filing the Review Petition is condoned. The application is disposed of.

CMP No. 447 of 2010.

2.

Allowed. The application is disposed of.

Civil Review No. 45 of 2010.

3.

The only prayer in the Review Petition is that the representation should be disposed of by the third Respondent instead of the second Respondent as directed in the judgment dated 11.3.2010. The petition is not opposed. Therefore, the petition is disposed of making it clear that Annexure P-5 and Annexure P-C (representations), shall be decided by the third Respondent.