High CourtsSingle Bench

Dhiraj Pal Singh Hundal vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 30 January 2003 · Citation: (2003) 01 P&H CK 0253

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amar Dutt, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 428 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 148, 149, 32, 324, 341
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc No. 23788-M of 2002
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 120 words

Amar Dutt, J.—Mr. Mansoor Ali state that the petitioners has joined the investigation and he is no longer required by the investigation agency.

2.

In view of this, the order dated 11.6.2002 is made absolute. It is, however, made clear that the benefit of this order will enure to the petitioner till the filing of the challan whereupon he would furnish fresh bail bond to the satisfaction of the trial court.

3.

In case, the petitioner, at any stage, absent himself from the court proceedings without the prior permission of the Court or threaten or try to pressurise the witnesses, it shall be open to the trial Court to cancel his bail and secure his presence through non bailable warrants.