High CourtsSingle Bench

Sanjeev vs State of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 21 February 2003 · Citation: (2003) 02 P&H CK 0234

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amar Dutt, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 120B, 363, 366
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc No. 41064-M of 2002
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 119 words

Amar Dutt

1.

Mr. Bhardwaj, on instructions from Shri Gulzar Singh ASI, state that the petitioner is no longer required for further investigation.

2.

In view of this, the order dated 27.9.2002 is made absolute. It is, however, made clear that the benefit of this order will enure to the petitioner till the filing of the challan whereupon he would furnish fresh bail bound to the satisfaction of the trial court.

3.

In case the petitioner at any stage, absents himself from the court proceedings without the prior permission or the Court or threatens or tries to pressurise the witnesses, it shall be open to the trial Court to cancel his bail and secure his presence through non-bailable warrants.