AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
21 paragraphs · 442 wordsThis second application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 has been filed by applicant, who is implicated in connection with Crime
No.595/2019 registered at Police Station Rajendra Nagar, Indore District Indore (MP) for offence punishable under Sections 450, 376 (2) (n) and 506
of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and also under Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.
As per prosecution case, on the basis of the allegations made by the prosecutrix regarding house trespass, criminal intimidation and commission of
rape on the pretext of marriage, the case has been registered against the present applicant.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has not committed any offence and he has falsely been implicated in the present
crime. The applicant is in custody since 24.08.2019. Earlier bail application of the applicant was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated
18.12.2019 passed in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.51042/2019 granting liberty to renew his prayer after recording court statement of the
prosecutrix. Now, statement of the prosecutrix has been recorded before the trial Court on 27.01.2020 and she has not stated any thing against the
applicant and turns hostile. Under these circumstances, no alleged offence is made out against the applicant. The investigation is over and charge
sheet has already been filed. There is no possibility of his absconsion or tempering the evidence, if enlarged on bail. Conclusion of the trial will take
sufficiently long time. Under these circumstances, learned counsel for the applicant prays for grant of bail to the applicant.
Learned Public Prosecutor for the non-applicant / State of Madhya Pradesh opposes the bail application by contending that no sufficient ground is
made out for releasing the applicant on bail; hence he prayed for rejection of the application.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, but without commenting on the
merits of the case, the application filed by the applicant is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail upon his / her furnishing a personal
bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court, for his / her
regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he / she shall remain present before the Court concerned during trial and
shall also abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
This order shall be effective till the end of the trial, however, in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
Certified copy, as per rules.
