High CourtsSingle Bench

Sudarshan Sharma vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 6 November 2025 · Citation: (2025) 11 P&H CK 1914

HON’BLE JUDGES
Deepinder Singh Nalwam, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 3963 Of 2001(O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 176 words

Deepinder Singh Nalwa, J

1.

In the present writ petition, the petitioner is praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release the retiral benefits to the petitioner which have been illegally withheld.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present petition, it has come to his knowledge that petitioner has expired. He further submits that in spite of making various efforts, he could not contact legal representatives of the petitioner.

3.

Faced with the above situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition may be disposed of, however, liberty may be granted to file an application for revival of the petition, in case need so arises or if he is able to contact the legal representatives of the petitioner.

4.

Learned State counsel does not oppose the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

5.

In view of above, the present petition is disposed of with liberty aforesaid.

6.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand(s) disposed of.