High CourtsSingle Bench

Tulip Publications Private Limited vs Government Of Sikkim

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 5 March 2025 · Citation: (2025) 03 SIK CK 0685

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 32 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 114 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of repeated requests he has not received any oral instructions from the petitioner. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent however, submits that the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent has been amicably resolved. Since the learned counsel for the petitioner has no instructions, this Court deems it fit to adjourn this matter to 08.04.2025. On the said date, the petitioner’s representative shall also be present before this Court. Let a copy of this order be served upon the petitioner in the usual manner. The Registry to take necessary steps in this regard.

2.

List on 08.04.2025.