High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 12 SIK CK 0018

Union Of India & Ors vs State Of Sikkim & Ors

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 5 December 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 38 Of 2022

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 101 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

Records reveal that the State-Government had sought two adjournments to file Counter-Affidavit which has still not been filed. According to the learned Additional Advocate General, records are voluminous and therefore he is unable to do so. He desires further two weeks’ time.

2.

Learned Counsel for Respondents No.3 to 23 also desires two weeks time to file Counter-Affidavit.

3.

Time prayed for by the learned Additional Advocate General and learned Counsel for Respondents No.3 to 23 is granted. Rejoinder thereafter within two weeks, if so desired.

4.

In view of the ensuing winter vacation, list thereafter.