High CourtsSingle Bench

Arjun Singh vs State Of M.P

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 4 September 2020 · Citation: (2020) 09 MP CK 0042

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anand Pathak, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 294, 307, 323, 324, 325, 326, 506
RESULT
Allowed/Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 29759 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 1,180 words

The applicant has filed this first bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail. Applicant has been arrested on 2.6.2020 by Police Station, Joura, District Morena, in connection with Crime No.218/2020 for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 325, 323, 294, 324, 506, 326, 34 of IPC.

It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that false case has been registered against him and he is suffering confinement since 2.6.2020, whereas charge-sheet has already been filed. He does not bear any criminal record. It is further submitted that at the instance of present applicant, cross-case has been registered in which allegations of Marpeet were levelled by the applicant and other persons on behalf of the applicant. It is a case of free fight. He relied upon the judgments of the Apex Court in the case of Gajanand and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1954 SC 695, Puran vs. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1976 SC 912 and Munir Khan vs. State of U.P. , AIR 1971 SC 335.

Confinement amounts to pretrial detention. He undertakes to cooperate in trial and would not be a source of embarrassment/harassment to the complainant party in any manner. He further undertakes to perform community service and to serve national/environmental cause to purge his misdeeds, if any. On these premises, he prayed for bail Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and prayed for dismissal of the bail application.

Heard learned counsel for the parties at length through VC and considered the arguments advanced by them.

Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the applicant as well as fact situation of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is allowed. It is hereby directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) along with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court and that he will have to install Arogya Setu App, if not already installed.

In view of COVID-19 pandemic, the jail authorities are directed that before releasing the applicant, his preliminary Corona Virus test shall be conducted and if he is found negative, then the concerned local administration shall make necessary arrangements for sending the applicant to his house, and if he is found positive then the applicant shall be immediately sent to concerned hospital for his treatment as per medical norms. If the applicant is fit for release and if he is in a position to make his personal arrangements, then he shall be released only after taking due travel permission from local administration. After release, the applicant is further directed to strictly follow all the instructions which may be issued by the Central Govt./State Govt. or Local Administration for combating the Covid19. If it is found that the applicant has violated any of the instructions (whether general or specific) issued by the Central Govt./State Govt. or Local Administration, then this order shall automatically lose its effect, and the Local Administration/Police Authorities shall immediately take him in custody and would sent him to the same jail from where he was released.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-

1.The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

2.

The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3.

The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4.

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused ;

5.

Applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during trial and he shall not move in the vicinity of the complainant and shall not cause any embarrassment/harassment to the complainant party in any manner ;

6.

The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be; and

7.

The applicant will inform the SHO of concerned police station about his residential address in the said area and it would be the duty of the Public Prosecutor to send E-copy of this order to SHO of concerned police station for information.

8.

एतद् द्वारा यह निर्देशित किया जाता है कि आवेदक 2 पौधों का ( फल देने वाले पेड़ अथवा नीम/पीपल) रोपण करेगा तथा उसे अपने आस पडोस में पेड़ों की सुरक्षा के लिए बाड़ लगाने की व्यवस्था करनी होगी ताकि पौधे सुरक्षित रह सके। आवेदक का यह कर्तव्य है कि न केवल पौधों को लगाया जाऐ, बल्कि उन्हें पोषण भी दिया जाए। ''वृक्षारोपण के साथ, वृक्षापोषण भी आवश्यक है।" आवेदक विशेषत : 6-8 फीट ऊॅंचे पौधे/पेड़ों को लगायेगा ताकि वे शीघ्र ही पूर्ण विकसित हो सकें। अनुपालन सुनिश्चित करने के लिए, आवेदक को रिहा किये जाने की दिनांक से 30 दिनों के भीतर संबंधित विचारण न्यायालय के समक्ष वृक्षों/पौधों के रोपण के सभी फोटो प्रस्तुत करना होगें। तत्पश्चात्, विचारण के समापन तक हर तीन महीने में आवेदक के द्वारा विचारण न्यायालय के समक्ष प्रगति रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत की जाएगी ।

वृक्षों की प्रगति पर निगरानी रखना विचारण न्यायालय का कर्तव्य है क्योंकि पर्यावरण क्षरण के कारण मानव अस्तित्व दांव पर है और न्यायालय अनुपालन के बारे में आवेदक  द्वारा  दिखाई  गई  किसी  भी  लापरवाही  को  नजर  अंदाज  नही  कर सकता है। इसलिए आवेदक को पेड़ों की प्रगति और आवेदक द्वारा अनुपालन के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत करने के लिए निर्देशित किया जाता है एवं आवदेक द्वारा किये गये अनुपालन की एक संक्षप्ति रिपेर्ट इस न्यायालय के समक्ष  प्रत्येक तीन माह में (अगले  छः  महीनों  के  लिए)  रखी  जायेगी  जिसे  कि  ''निर्देश "  शीर्ष  के  अंतर्गत रखा जाएगा।

वृक्षारोपण  में  या  पेड़ों  की  देखभाल  में  आवेदक  की  ओर  से  की  गई  कोई  भी चूक आवेदक को जमानत का लाभ लेने से वंचित कर सकती है।

आवेदक को अपनी पसंद के स्थान पर इन पौधों/पेडों को रोपने की स्वतंत्रता होगी, यदि वह इन रोपे गये पेडों की ट्री गार्ड या बाड़ लगाकर रक्षा करना चाहता है, अन्यथा आवेदक को वृक्षों के रोपण के लिए तथा उनके सुरक्षा उपायों के लिए आवश्यक खर्चे वहन करना होगें।

इस न्यायालय द्वारा यह निर्देश एक परीक्षण प्रकरण के तौर पर दिए गए हैं ताकि हिंसा और बुराई के विचार का प्रतिकार, सृजन एवं प्रकृति के साथ एकाकार होने के माध्यम से सामांजस्य स्थापित किया जा सके। वर्तमान में मानव अस्तित्व के आवश्यक अंग के रूप में दया, सेवा, प्रेम एवं करूंणा की प्रकृति को विकसित करने की आवश्यकता है क्योंकि यह मानव जीवन की मूलभूत प्रवृतियां हैं और मानव अस्तित्व को बनाए रखने के लिए इनका पुनर्जीवित होना आवश्यक है।

''यह प्रयास केवल एक वृक्ष के रोपण का प्रश्न न होकर बल्कि एक विचार के अंकुरण का है।"

Application stands allowed and disposed of. E- copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance, if possible from the office of this Court.

Certified copy/ e-copy as per rules/directions.