High CourtsSingle Bench

Dr. Madan Kumar Yada vs Sikkim University

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 3 May 2023 · Citation: (2023) 05 SIK CK 0011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 22 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 85 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

The no objection of the respondent filed by Mr. Saurabh Tamang, Advocate, Mr. Tenzing Thinlay Lepcha, Advocate, Mr. Saurav Singh, Advocate and Mr. Johnson Subba, Advocate are taken on record. Their prayer to retire from the case as Advocates for the respondent is accepted.

Mr. B.C. Tamang, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the rejoinder was filed recently and he needs sometime to examine it.

On the request of the learned counsel for the respondent, list this matter on 20.06.2023.