High CourtsSingle Bench

Dr. Madan Kumar Yadav vs Sikkim University

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 28 June 2022 · Citation: (2022) 06 SIK CK 0031

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 22 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 119 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

I.A. No. 04 of 2021

Heard Ms. Roma Bhagat, learned counsel for the petitioner in I.A. No. 04 of 2021. It is submitted that the petitioner has been appointed in Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) as a permanent faculty on 11.08.2021. In view of this fact the petitioner no longer desires to seek the permanent appointment with the respondent University beyond 11.08.2021. On reading of the interim application however, it does not clearly state so. Thus, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the same and file afresh. Permitted. I.A. No. 04 of 2021 stands disposed as withdrawn. The matter will once again be taken up through video conferencing mode on 17.08.2022.