High CourtsSingle Bench

Dr. Madan Kumar Yadav vs Sikkim University

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 17 August 2022 · Citation: (2022) 08 SIK CK 0015

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 22 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 107 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

I.A. No. 06 of 2022

Yet another application has been filed by the petitioner. This time the petitioner desires that the previous order passed by this court on 06.07.2021 be modified on the statements made therein. A perusal of the said application does not reflect the correct factual position as seen from the records. This was pointed out to the learned counsel for the petitioner who seeks time to examine it further and take appropriate steps.

Mr. Saurabh Tamang, learned counsel for the respondent does not object to the adjournment sought for. Four weeks time as prayed for is granted.

List on 15.09.2022.