High CourtsSingle Bench

Dr. Madan Kumar Yadav vs Sikkim University

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 15 September 2022 · Citation: (2022) 09 SIK CK 0017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 22 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 90 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

I.A. No. 06 of 2022

Ms. Roma Bhagat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner desires to withdraw I.A. No. 06 of 2022 which is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent. I.A. No. 06 of 2022 stands withdrawn.

I.A. No. 07 of 2022

This is an application filed by the petitioner for amendment of the writ petition. The learned counsel for the respondent desires to file a short reply within a period of three weeks. Time sought for is granted.

List thereafter, on 02.11.2022.