High CourtsSingle Bench

Dr. Madan Kumar Yadav vs Sikkim University

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 12 October 2023 · Citation: (2023) 10 SIK CK 0033

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 22 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 95 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

I.A. No. 08 of 2023

1.

The learned counsel, appearing in proxy, on behalf of Mr. B.C. Tamang, learned counsel for the respondent, submits that Mr. B. C. Tamang is in Siliguri and could not come back due to the road condition. Coupled with the fact that the Sikkim University is also closed pursuant to a notification of the Government of Sikkim, reply to I.A. No. 08 of 2023 could not be filed. Therefore, he seeks four weeks time to do so. Time sought for is granted.

2.

List on 28.11.2023.