AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
7 paragraphs · 121 wordsSanjay Kumar, CJ
Mr. Rajiv Thokchom, learned counsel, appears for some of the respondents in the CRP.
Mr. Th. Monish, learned counsel, seeks an adjournment on behalf of Mr. N. Surendrajit, learned counsel for the appellants in RSA No. 12 of 2016 and the applicants in the miscellaneous cases.
Mr. A. Mohendro, learned counsel, states that he entered appearance for all the respondents in the 2nd appeal and the miscellaneous cases and also the petitioners in the CRP by filing his vakalatnamas today.
Registry is directed to print his name in the cause-list after verification.
In consequence, the names of Mr. I. Lalitkumar, learned senior counsel; and Mr. I. Denning, learned counsel, shall be deleted from the cause-list.
Post on 13.02.2023.
