High CourtsSingle Bench

M/s Shri Nityanand Ji Industries vs State Of H.P.& Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 24 November 2020 · Citation: (2020) 11 SHI CK 0199

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Sharma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 1589 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 147 words

Sandeep Sharma, J

1.

Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that the petitioner would be content and satisfied in case respondent No.3 is

directed to decide his representation (Annexure P-14), which is pending adjudication before the authority for considerable time.

2.

Learned Central Government Counsel representing respondent No.3 is not averse to the aforesaid prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.

3.

Consequently, in view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to decide the representation (Annexure

P-14), if not already decided, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Needless to say, authority

concerned while complying with the direction made in the instant order, shall afford an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and pass speaking

order. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

Copy dasti.