High CourtsDivision Bench

Pavan Kumar vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 21 May 2024 · Citation: (2024) 05 UK CK 0115

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ritu Bahri, CJ · Rakesh Thapliyal, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/B) No. 48 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 105 words

Ritu Bahri, CJ

1.

Counsel for the State has tendered in Court the letter of the District Magistrate, Chamoli dated 14.03.2024. The same is taken on record.

2.

As per the said letter of the District Magistrate dated 14.03.2024, the new tender which was floated, has been awarded in favour of the petitioner, and he has deposited the amount. In view of the said development, he submits that this Writ Petition has rendered infructuous.

3.

In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

4.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.