AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
3 paragraphs · 144 wordsHon''ble Pankaj Mithal, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This is a petition for a direction upon the court concerned to decide Suit No. 632 of 2003 (Ramanand Vs. Prahlad and others) within a time bound period.
In view of the general mandamus of the Division Bench of this court in Ayodhya Sahai Vs. District Judge and Others, and looking to the fact that the case is of the year 2003, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the court concerned to decide the same in accordance with the law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of the certified copy of this order, provided there is no legal impediment.
The aforesaid direction would become ineffective in case the petitioner himself seeks two continuous adjournments in the suit. Petition disposed of.
