AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 85 wordsAhanthem Bimol Singh, J
Heard Mrs. RK Emily, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. A. Vashum, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent No. 1.
Office note indicated that no report has been received as to whether notice has been served upon respondent No. 2 or not.
In view of the above, await service report.
List this case again on 15.07.2022.
In the meantime, petitioner is at liberty to file rejoinder affidavit to the counter affidavit filed by respondent No. 1, if so advised.