AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
4 paragraphs · 82 wordsAhanthem Bimol Singh, J
Mr. Anjan Prasad Sahu, learned counsel appeared for the petitioner and Mr. Th. Sukumar, learned GA appeared for the official respondents.
Mr. P. Tamphamani, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 8 submitted that an application had been filed raising the maintainability of the present writ petition and the learned counsel, accordingly, prays for taking up this matter along with the said application.
As prayed for, list this case again on 15-03-2023 along with the said misc. application.
