AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 91 wordsAhanthem Bimol Singh, J
Heard Mr. R.K. Milan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent No. 1.
It has been submitted by Mr. Ch. Momon, learned counsel that Mr. A. Kulabidhu, who is the counsel for the respondent No. 2 is indisposed and he is not in a position to appear before this court.
In view of the above, a prayer has been made for taking up this matter after two weeks.
As prayed for, list this case again on 09-06-2022.