High CourtsSingle Bench

Sumpi Pekham Anal vs State Of Manipur & 3 Ors

Manipur High Court · Decided on 15 April 2025 · Citation: (2025) 04 MAN CK 0513

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahanthem Bimol Singh, J
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Case (Writ Petition (C)) No. 250, 179 Of 2025, Writ Petition (C) No. 183 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 107 words

Ahanthem Bimol Singh, J

Mr. K. Roshan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he will file rejoinder affidavit in the main petition as well as objection in the connected application during the course of the day with an advance copy to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The ld. counsel prays for taking up these matters after two weeks.

Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned GA appearing for the State respondents and Mr. Nongdamba, learned counsel appearing for the private respondent submitted that they have no objection. As prayed for, list these cases again on 02.05.2025.

Earlier interim order shall be continued till the next date.